A biomechanical comparison of unlocked or locked reamed intramedullary nails in the treatment of mid-third simple transverse femoral shaft fractures.

BACKGROUND Despite that a mid-third simple transverse femoral shaft fracture has been traditionally treated with an unlocked reamed intramedullary nail, recently a static locked reamed intramedullary nail has been favored by some orthopedists to avoid missing extended fracture lines. A prospective comparison of both nails was conducted to investigate the superiority between the nails from biomechanical viewpoints. METHODS Seven pairs of fresh healthy cadaver femora underwent mid-third transverse osteotomy. Consequently, all seven left femora were stabilized using Kuntscher nails and all seven right femora, static Russell-Taylor locked nails. Finally, all 14 femora were tested using a Material Testing System (MTS) machine to investigate the sustained mechanical loads, the maximal failure load, and the relative fragment displacement. RESULTS The locked nails produced the larger mechanical loads (p = 0.02). The unlocked nails had the larger fragment displacement (p = 0.02) and the higher maximal failure load (6090 verse 5590 newtons, p = 0.02). All tests ended due to basal neck oblique fractures. CONCLUSIONS Biomechanically, an unlocked nail, being a load-sharing device, is superior to a static locked nail, being a load-bearing device, in the treatment of a mid-third simple transverse femoral shaft fracture. Clinically, careful investigation of the fracture types and adequate selection of the nail type should be performed in treating these types of fractures.